Critics of Obama way off base on this one
6:00 am January 7, 2010, by Bob Barr
Yes — the not-so-bright, would-be terrorist from Nigeria got though international and domestic security mechanisms supposed to have stopped him long before the jerk lit his underwear afire before landing in Detroit. And yes — the incident happened during the administration of President Barack Obama. But the sniping at the president by Republicans, including former Vice President Cheney, and by conservative radio and TV commentators, borders on — if not passing into — asinine.
The criticism has included such childishness as blasting Obama for waiting a few days before making a national speech on the incident. For heaven’s sake, the president was briefed on the incident from the moment it occured; he made statements almost immediately indicating his concern and that he was being regularly briefed; he took time to gather the facts and meet with his national security team; and then he appeared publicly to give a rational, measured, but hard-hitting response. And for this, a former vice president criticizes him.
Partisanship truly has pervasively infected our political system when a reasonable, measured, factual, timely and substantive response by a president to a single security incident — the roots of which clearly indicate long-simmering problems that predated his tenure in office — is publicly blasted as irresponsible. In point of fact, those levelling such counterproductive attacks are the ones engaging in irresponsible behavior.
5 comments:
I'm gonna go with you on this one soapie. I have more of a problem with Janet "the system worked just fine" Napolitano than Obama but I did recently say that even if Obama helped an old lady cross the road many would have a problem with it. Obama's Nobel speech was quite good coming from Obama but do we remember it?
...which might explain my blogger's block today, not being partisan to begin with it never occured to me to attack Obama in a blog over this. Reading your other blog a few days ago I sense your growing frustration.
Frustrating indeed. Of course you then have the apologists that insist "Well..this didn't happen on George Bush's watch." And, while this is indeed probably true, I think it has much less to do with who is taking up residency in the oval office than others seem to think.
But who can forget George Bush reading to those schoolchildren on the morning of 9/11 and after being told of the tragic events not closing the book and saying "I have urgent business to attend to." Honestly I don't judge him on this, could look past it as there's so many other things but fairness and consistency are fairness and consistency.
It's partisan politics at its finest.
Post a Comment